Dismissed
Purshottam v. Raheja v State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/1422/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1422 OF 2005
Purshottam V. Raheja.
... Petitioner
Versus.
State of Maharashtra & others.
... Respondents.
Shri D.D.Madan i/by M/s.Bachubhai Munim & Co. for the Petitioner.
Shri Niranjan Pandit, A.G.P.for respondents 1 & 2. Shri Samir Bhalekar for respondent 3. Ms.Betty D’Souza, i/by Shri M.P.Vashi for respondent 4.
CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI &
ABHAY S. OKA, JJ.
DATED : 29th November, 2005.
P.C.:
| the inst |
ruction | s | of | Shri | Hemant | Mo |
kashi, A |
ssistant | Legal | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manager | of | respon | dent | 2, | states | that |
the | matter | is | ||
| likely | to | be | settled | bet | ween | respondent | 3 | and | |||
| respondents | 4 | to | 6. | He | states | that | respondent | 3 has |
not |
||
| attached | the | pr | operty | involv | ed | in | this | petition | and | they | |
| do not |
intend | to | do | so | in | pursuance | of | the | notices |
impugned in this petition. He states that respondents 2
and 3 may issue fresh notice if necessary.
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
(Smt.Ranjana Desai, J.)
(Abhay S.Oka, J.)
Purshottam V. Raheja
State of Maharashtra
others
Ranjana Desai
Abhay S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court