Dismissed
M/S Rajtaru Videosonic Ltd.Shri Ramesh Agarwal v. Gaurang v.Doshi and Anr.
Bombay HCSS/3482/2003
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUMMARY SUIT NO.3482 OF 2003
M/s.Rajtaru Videosonic Ltd. Plaintiff
versus
Gaurang Vinod Doshi and others Defendants
Mr.A.V.Jain for plaintiff.
Mr.Dasgupta i/by J.Narulla & Associates for
defendant no.2.
Mr.S.H.Karim for defendant no.1.
CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.
DATE : 8th July 2005
PC :
1. Mr.Jain appearing for plaintiff seeks leave
to withdraw the suit. Learned advocate appearing
for defendants has no objection to plaintiff
withdrawing the suit. Leave granted. Suit
dismissed for non prosecution. Refund of court
fees as per rules. No order as to costs. Notice
of Motion as well as Summons for Judgement taken
out in the summary suit do not survive and are
accordingly disposed off. All interim orders to
stand vacated.
(S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
M/s.Rajtaru Videosonic Ltd.
Gaurang Vinod Doshi
S.C.Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court