The High Court of Bombay, in a summary suit for recovery, disposed of the matter by recording judgment minutes on admission and passing orders in terms thereof. The summons for judgment was also disposed off.
Orders passed in terms of minutes of decree on admission; summons for judgment disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUMMARY SUIT NO.252 OF 2003
Mrs.Shanta H. Jain Plaintiff
versus
A.R.Thakkar Farsan Sweet and
Bakery and another Defendants
Mr.Ramesh Jain for plaintiff
Mr.Vinod Mishra i/by Shyam K.Sthalekar for
defendants.
CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.
DATE : 6th July 2005
PC :
1. In this summary suit parties have tendered
minutes of decree on admission. These minutes
are signed by plaintiff, defendant no.1,
defendant no.2 and their advocates. Each of the
defendants have agreed to the terms and are
submitting to a decree on admission. Minutes
taken on record. Order in terms of minutes.
Refund of court fee as per rules. Computation of
advocates’ costs also as per rules. In the light
of minutes, no orders on the Summons for
Judgement No.771 of 2003 and it is disposed off.
(S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
A.R. Thakkar Farsan Sweet and Bakery
another
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court