Dismissed

Sigma Fiscals P.Ltd. v. Electrex India Ltd. and Ors.

Bombay HC17 Aug 2005SJ/624/2002

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay dismissed summonses for judgment in five debtor suits pending in bankruptcy resolution proceedings. The court allowed withdrawal with liberty to file fresh summ ons. No reasoning was provided in such a thin order.

What did the court decide?

Summons for Judgment dismissed. Plaintiffs directed to inform defendants and Prothonotary every six months and within 15 days of any final order.

Sigma Fiscals P.Ltd. Vs Electrex India Ltd. and Ors. — Banking and Recovery | Bombay HC (2005)

¶1

:1:

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

 O.O.C.J.

¶4

 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 624 OF 2002

¶5

IN

¶6

 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 10 OF 2002

¶7

 Sigma Fiscals P.Ltd .....Plffs.

¶8

vs.

¶9

 Electrex India Ltd

¶10

 and Ors. .....Defnds.

¶11

 A L O N G W I T H

¶12

 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 625 OF 2002

¶13

IN

¶14

 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 12 OF 2002

¶15

 Dungershi V. Chheda .....Plffs.

¶16

vs.

¶17

 Electrex India Ltd

¶18

 and Ors. .....Defnds.

¶19

:2:

¶20

 A L O N G W I T H
 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 626 OF 2002
 IN
 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 13 OF 2002

¶21

 Deepak D. Chheda .....Plffs.
 vs.
 Electrex India Ltd
 and Ors. .....Defnds.

¶22

 A L O N G W I T H
 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 627 OF 2002
 IN
 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 17 OF 2002

¶23

 M/s. Appex Apparels India .....Plffs.
 vs.
 Electrex India Ltd

¶24

:3:

¶25

 and Ors. .....Defnds.

¶26

 A L O N G W I T H

¶27

 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 629 OF 2002
 IN
 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 19 OF 2002

¶28

 M/s. Advance Products .....Plffs.

¶29

 vs.
 Electrex India Ltd
 and Ors. .....Defnds.

¶30

 Pravin Mehta and Mithi and Co. for all the

¶31

 plaintiffs.

¶32

CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J.
DATE : 17TH AUGUST, 2005.

¶33

P.C. :.

¶34

:4:

¶35

 1. In view of the affidavit dated 17.8.2005 the

¶36

 learned counsel for the plaintiffs seeks to
 withdraw the Summons for Judgment with liberty to
 take out fresh Summons for Judgment after the

¶37

 company comes out of the BIFR.

¶38

 2. The learned counsel for the plaintiff is

¶39

 directed to inform the defendants advocate and
 Prothonotary and Senior Master about the status of
 the proceedings every six months and if any final
 order is passed within 15 days from the passing of
 the said order.

¶40

 3. Summons for Judgment dismissed with the
 aforesaid liberty.

¶41

 sd/-

¶42

 **********

Sigma Fiscals P.Ltd. v. Electrex India Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sigma Fiscals P.Ltd. v. Electrex India Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bobcards Ltd. Vs Subhash R. Thakur

Ashok S. Waghare Vs Pallari and Ors.

Bobcards Ltd. Vs P.K.Chowhan

Bank of India Vs Associated Constn. and Ors.

Ashokkumar v Pasad Vs Sahadev v Jadeja

Bobcards Limited Vs Sandeep M.Talim