A summary suit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed for non-proseculation, as the plaintiff did not appear and the summons for judgment had not been served on the defendant.
Summons for judgement dismissed for non prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUMMONS FOR JUDGEMENT NO. 518 Of 2003
IN
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 815 OF 2003
Madhusudan Mimani .. Plaintiffs
versus
M/s.Emblem Asia Pvt.ltd. .. Defendants
...
None for the plaintiff.
Mr.P.V. Rajan for the defendant.
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK,J.
DATED : 1st March 2005.
P.C.:
1. None present for the plaintiff. The learned
counsel for the defendant states that the Summons for
Judgement has not been served. Summons for Judgement
dismissed for non prosecution.
D.G KARNIK,J
D.G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court