Dismissed
Dinesh a.Jaising v. Rishi Tejuja
Bombay HCSJ/51/2004
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The suit disposed by consent terms rendered a summons for judgment infructuous, which was dismissed accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Summons for judgment No. 51 of 2004 dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
1
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
¶3
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶4
SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 51 OF 2004
¶5
IN
¶6
SUM. SUIT NO. 125 OF 2004
¶7
Maneklal Keshavlal Shah
¶8
& Anr. ... Plaintiffs
¶9
vs.
¶10
Romell Real Estate Pvt.
¶11
Ltd., & Ors. ... Defendants.
¶12
Mr. N.S. Fadia for the plaintiffs.
¶13
Ms. S. John i/by M.P. Savla & Co.
Coram
AI extract
S.U. Kamdar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court