Allowed
Ramesh Keshav Kadam v. Sona Art and Anr.
Bombay HCSJ/234/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶2
SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.234 OF 2005
¶3
IN
¶4
SUMMARY SUIT NO.727 OF 2005
¶5
Rameshd K. Kadam ....Plaintiff
V/s.
¶6
Sona Art & Anr. ....Defendants
¶7
Mr.Suresh Gole for the Plaintiff.
None for the Defendants.
¶8
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.
DATED : 7TH OCTOBER, 2005.
¶9
P.C. :
¶10
1. The suit is filed to recover the amounts due
¶11
in respect of the promissory notes executed by the
Defendants.
¶12
2. There is no affidavit in reply. There is no
defence to the suit.
Coram
AI extract
S.J. VAZIFDAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court