Two second appeals arising from matrimonial matters were disposed of on the appellant's statement that she had expired. The court held that nothing survives and dismissed both appeals.
Both second appeals are disposed of as nothing survives on the appellant's death.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 539 OF 1995
Smt. Manjula Rajendra Pandav.. ..... Appellant.
Versus
Rajendra Narahari Pandav..... Respondent.
-: ALONG WITH :-
SECOND APPEAL NO. 365 OF 1995
Smt. Manjula Rajendra Pandav.. ..... Appellant.
Versus
Rajendra Narahari Pandav..... Respondent.
Ms. Gauri Godse for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
DATED : 9TH DECEMBER, 2005.
P.C. :
Both these appeals are arising out of matrimonial
matter between the parties. The learned Counsel
appearing for the appellant makes a statement that the
appellant / wife, Smt. Manjula expired. In view of
this, in such matters, there is nothing survive. Both
these second appeals are accordingly disposed of.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Smt. Manjula Rajendra Pandav
Rajendra Narahari Pandav
Anoop V. Motta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court