A second appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution after counsel for the appellants stated that the parties had settled the dispute, though uncertified copies of supporting papers were not admitted on record.
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO.234 OF 1989
Bhagwan Rama Maske and Ors. .. Appellants
Versus
Shri Anand Tatya Kadam .. Respondent
Mr.R.S.Apte for appellants
Mr.V.B.Rajure for respondent
CORAM : P.V.KAKADE, J.
DATE : 24TH AUGUST, 2005.
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. The learned counsel for the appellants makes a
statement that both the parties have settled the
dispute. In support of his statement he has brought to
my notice xerox copy of Pursis filed by the parties in
this Appeal in Regular Civil Appeal No.52 of 2002 filed
in the Court of Addl. District Judge, Islampur. the
Xerox copy being uncertified copy cannot be taken on
record. However, on the basis of statement made by the
learned counsel for the appellants the appeal stands
dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to
: 2 :
costs.
Bhagwan Rama Maske and Ors.
Shri Anand Tatya Kadam
P.V.KAKADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court