Rajan Madhukar Kalangutkar and Ors. v. Vikas Ramchandra Jagtap and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.202 OF 2001.
Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J.
DATED : 22nd July, 2005.
P.C.:
| 1. | The | Appl | icants | have | filed | servi | ce | affidavit. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Howeve | r, copy |
of | the | acknowle | dgement | is | not | filed |
| on | record. | Hence | the |
affida |
vit ca |
nnot | be | treated |
| as | service affida |
vit. | There | is | non-c | ompliance | with | |
| the | conditional | order | dat | ed 21 |
st Jan |
uary | 2003, | as |
| the | service affida |
vit | which | is | filed | is | not | proper. |
| Hence | conditional | order | dated | 21st | J | anuary | 2003 |
will operate and accordingly the Revision
Application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Judge.
ABHAY S.OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court