The Bombay High Court disposed of the plaintiff's notice of motion in suit Summ.Suit no.944 of 2003, ending the matter as the underlying suit had concluded without survival.
The notice of motion is disposed of as the underlying suit does not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Notice of motion no.872 of 2003
in
SUMM.SUIT NO. 944 OF 2003
Deve. Cre. Bank Ltd .. Plff
vs
Mr.Jagdish C.Sharma ..Deft
CORAM: D.G.KARNIK, J
DATED :10th March 2005.
P.C:-
1. In view of the disposal of the suit does not
survive and is disposed of.
D.G.KARNIK, J
Deve. Cre. Bank Ltd
Mr.Jagdish C.Sharma
D.G.KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court