Coram of D.G. Karnik, J. Granted ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) of the notice of motion; declined relief under prayer clause (a) by relying on reasons in Motion No. 247 of 2005.
Ad-interim relief granted per prayer clause (b); relief per prayer clause (a) declined.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 246 OF 2005
IN
SUIT NO. 188 OF 2005
Preeti Bhatia .. Plaintiffs
versus
Sonam Builders & ors. .. Defendants
Mr.K.R. Dhanuka with Mr.M.B. Jadhav for the
plaintiff.
Mr.S.G. Deshmukh with Mr.M.S. Kumthekar for the
defendant no.4.
Mr.R.D. Suryavanshi for the defendant nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK,J.
DATED : 4th March 2005.
P.C.:
1. The learned counsel for the parties state that
the facts in this motion are almost identical with
the fact in motion no. 247 of 2005 except some small
variations in the date of agreement and date of
possession. Hence, for the reasons recorded in
Motion NO.247 of 2005, there shall be ad-interim
relief in terms of prayer clause (b). Ad-interim
relief in terms of prayer clause (a) declined.
Motion is made returnable in due course.
D.G. KARNIK,J
D.G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court