The high court dismissed a notice of motion filed in the context of a main appeal, stating that as the main appeal was dismissed, no order was required on the motion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Notice of Motion no. 2895 of 2004
in
Appeal No. 6ll of 2004
in
Notice of Motion No.537 of 2002
in
Suit No. 506 of 2002
Smt Saha Sultan Bai w/o Abdul
Ali Ghulam Parpia and ors. Appellants
vs
Mahmood Ahmed Hussain.. respondent
Mr.P.C.Dani with Khan Javed Akhtar for appellants
Ms N Y Sanglikar for respondent
CORAM: A.P.SHAH & S.J.VAZIFDAR JJ.
Dated 15.2.2005
P.C:
Heard advocate for the parties.
. In view of the dismissal of the main appeal, no
order on the notice of motion. Accordinly motion
stands disposed of.
Smt Saha Sultan Bai w/o Abdul Ali Ghulam Parpia and ors.
Mahmood Ahmed Hussain
A.P. Shah
S.J. Vazifdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court