The High Court of Bombay dismissed the letters patent appeal as not maintainable against an order passed under Article 227 of the Constitution. The accompanying civil application was disposed of as infructuous.
The appeal was dismissed and the civil application was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 67 OF 2005
-: ALONG WITH :-
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 63 OF 2005
Obedur Rehman Shaikh.......
...Appellant.
Versus
Suresh J. Khade..........Respondent.
None present.
CORAM : V. G. PALSHIKAR &
D. B. BHOSALE, JJ.
DATED : OCTOBER 20, 2005.
P.C. :
None appears for the Appellant. This Appeal is
directed against the order passed under Article 227 of
the Constitution of India. Such an Appeal is not
maintainable. Hence dismissed.
In view of the dismissal of the appeal itself,
the civil application has become infructuous and is
disposed of as such.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal under Article 227 of the Constitution is maintainable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Obedur Rehman Shaikh
Suresh J. Khade
V. G. Palshikar
D. B. Bhosale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court