The High Court remanded an income tax appeal back to the Tribunal to consider question No. 4 afresh, following principles of natural justice as per a previous order in a similar case.
Appeal remanded back to the Tribunal to consider question No. 4 afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.11 OF 2001
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Mumbai City - XV, Mumbai .. Appellant.
V/s.
Mr.Sharad Doshi .. Respondent.
Mr.Ashok Kotangale i/b. H.D. Rathod for the
appellant.
Mr.A.K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 22ND AUGUST, 2005.
P.C. :
1. The learned counsel appearing for both the
parties agreed that the appeal be disposed of in
terms of the order of this Court dated February 26,
2002 passed in the case of CIT V/s.Vikram A. Doshi
reported in [256 ITR 129 (Bombay)].
2. Considering the joint prayer made, for the
reasons recorded in the said order, the appeal is
remanded back to the Tribunal so as to consider only
question No.4 afresh in accordance with law following
the principles of natural justice.
3. The appeal stands disposed of in terms of
this order with no order as to costs.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
The Commissioner of Income Tax Mumbai City - XV
Mr. Sharad Doshi
V.C. DAGA
J.P. DEVADHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court