rejected by the learned JMFC, Panaji by order dated 16/08/05 and the Complainant has now invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code to set aside the said order. The Complainant has prosecuted the said accused for dishonour of cheque bearing No.320282 dated 22/3/03 for a sum of Rs. 41,976.40. It appears that the said cheque was returned, when presented for payment, with endorsement that the funds were insufficient. After examining the Complainant, the Complainant examined PW 2, Bank Manager who identified the signature of another Bank Manager on the said cheque return memo. The said cheque return memo mentions the number of the cheque as 320382. In other words the fourth digit has been mentioned as 3 instead of 2. This error apparently was noticed at the time of hearing of arguments and as a result of which the Complainant wrote a letter to the Bank dated 25/07/05 and the said bank namely Canara Bank, Panaji, replied to the said letter stating that the cheque number on the said memo be read as 320282 instead of 320382 and that the same letter may also be produced before the Court, if necessary. After the said letter was received the Complainant filed the said application dated 3/08/05 for recalling the said PW 2 with a view to explain the said error in mentioning the number of the cheque which came to be rejected by the impugned order dated 16/08/05.
