The High Court of Bombay at Goa allowed the appellant to withdraw the criminal appeal due to difficulty in serving respondent 1. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the appeal. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 51 OF 2004
STATE OF GOA
....Appellant
Versus
SAROJINI MULLANGI AND ANR., ....Respondents
Mrs. Winnie Coutinho,Public Prosecutor for the State/Appellant, Mr.Arun Bras De Sa, Advocate for Respondent no.2
Coram:N. A. BRITTO, J.
Date:21st November, 2005
P.C.
Ms. W. Coutinho, the Learned Public Prosecutor, present. She prays for leave to withdraw this appeal, as it is found very difficult to serve the respondent no.1/accused.
Shri Arun Bras De Sa, the learned Advocate on behalf of respondent no.2/accused is present.
Leave granted as prayed for. Appeal shall stand dismissed as withdrawn.
N. A. BRITTO, J.
NH
STATE OF GOA
SAROJINI MULLANGI AND ANR.
N. A. BRITTO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
