In Company Petition No.449 of 1999, the Bombay High Court disposed of the petition without further orders, noting an order of winding up was already passed in a companion petition, and directed petitioners to submit claims before the Official Liquidator.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PEITION NO.449 OF 1999
Societe Services Aeronautiques ...Petitioners
Versus
Skyline NEPC Ltd. (formerly
Damania Airways Ltd.) ...Respondents
None for Petitioners.
Mr.Pankaj Sawant i/b M/s.Rustamji & Ginwala for
Petitioners in companion Company Petition No.948/97.
Mr.G.R.Kinkhabwala i/b Mulla & Mulla &
Craigie Blunt & Caroe for Respondents.
CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
AUGUST 9, 2005.
P.C.
1. Not on Board. Heard along with Company
Petition No.948 of 1997, in view of the application
filed by the Petitioners herein in the said
companion Petition for such relief.
: 2 :
2. As order of winding up of Respondent
Company has already been passed in the companion
Company Petition No.948 of 1997, no further orders
are necessary on this Petition, except to observe
that it will be open to the Petitioners to submit
claim before the Official Liquidator and pursue the
same in accordance with law, if so advised.
3. Disposed of on the above terms.
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
Societe Services Aeronautiques
Skyline NEPC Ltd.
A.M.KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court