The Bombay High Court dismissed the company petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to file necessary affidavit of publication and comply with a conditional order despite admission.
The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO.387 OF 1998
Shri Mukesh C. Shah. .. Petitioner.
None appears.
CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J
DATE : AUGUST 5, 2005.
P.C. :
1. None appears for petitioner.
2. Petition stands admitted in terms of order
dated 7th November, 1998. Till now, affidavit of
publication has not been filed. The matter was
notified on 24th June, 2005 with office objection,
when conditional order was passed. Even, that
conditional order has not been complied with. In
other words, petitioner has not taken further steps
after admission of the petition, for which reason,
petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Shri Mukesh C. Shah
A.M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court