The company petition, admitted but not advertised or published, was dismissed as withdrawn by the court acceding to the petitioners' request.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO.155 OF 2000
M/s.Star Enterprises ...Petitioners
Versus
M/s.Trifams Industries Ltd. ...Respondents
Ms.Neeta Solanki i/b Kiran Jain for Petitioners.
None for Respondents.
CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
AUGUST 19, 2005.
P.C.
1. Although, the Petition is admitted,
affidavit has been filed by the Petitioners sworn
on 16th August 2005, stating that the Petition is
neither advertised nor published.
2. In this backdrop, request for withdrawal
of Petition is acceded to. Hence, dismissed as
withdrawn.
: 2 :
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
M/s.Star Enterprises
M/s.Trifams Industries Ltd.
A.M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court