Petitioner sought leave to withdraw Company Petition No. 10 of 2004 with liberty to approach other forums. The High Court of Bombay dismissed the petition as withdrawn with the granted liberty.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to adopt appropriate legal proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 10 OF 2004.
L.B.Kumavat. ... Petitioner.
V/s.
Lubrizol India Pvt.Ltd. ... Respondents.
Mrs. Neeta V. Masurkar, for the Petitioner.
Shri P.C. Pavaskar, for the respondents.
CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR,J
DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 2005.
P.C.:
1. The learned advocate for the petitioner
seeks leave to withdraw petition with liberty to
adopt appropriate legal proceedings. Petition is
dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
L.B.Kumavat
Lubrizol India Pvt.Ltd.
S.U.KAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court