Abdurazak Cheruparambil v. the Union of India and Ors.
Bombay HCCAW/2238/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
1
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶3
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2238 OF 2005
IN
¶4
WRIT PETITION NO.4055 OF 2005
¶5
Abdulrazak Cheruparambil .. Applicant.
V/s.
Union of India & Ors .. Respondents.
¶6
Mr.S.N. Kantawala i/b. Mr.Yogesh Rohira for the
applicant.
Mr.H.V. Mehta with Mr.Kiran Kandpile for the
respondents.
¶7
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
¶8
DATED : 1ST SEPTEMBER, 2005.
P.C. :
¶9
1. No orders are necessary in this Civil
¶10
Application. The request of extension of time shall
¶11
be considered only as and when the request comes from
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Abdulrazak Cheruparambil
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
AI extract
V.C. DAGA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court