The Court allowed the applicant to condone a three-day delay in filing a civil appeal, finding sufficient cause without inaction or negligence, and placed the appeal on board for admission.
Civil Application made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) only.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.202 OF 2002
IN
F.C.A.ST.NO.22713 OF 2002
Mr.Satyamurthi Pillay ..Applicant
Vs.
Mrs.Ambikarani Pillay ..Respondent
Ms.Kokila Karla for Smt.Manjula Rao for
Applicant
CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : NOVEMBER 29,2005
P.C.
1. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant.
None appears for the Respondent though served. By
this Civil Application, the Applicant is seeking
condonation of 3 days’ delay. For the reasons
stated in the Civil Application, sufficient cause
has been made out. There is no case of inaction,
negligence or want of bonafide. Hence, Civil
Application is made absolute in terms of prayer
clause (a) only.
- 2 -
2. Appeal to be placed on board for admission on
13.12.2005.
[DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause is made out for condonation of a three-day delay in filing a civil appeal.
Satyamurthi Pillay
Ambikarani Pillay
S.RADHAKRISHNAN
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court