Disposed
Shivajirao Vitthal Kalange v. Tukaram Sakharam Kalambe and Ors.
Bombay HCCAF/955/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.F.955/2005
IN
FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.421/2005.
Shivajirao V.Kalange Vs.
.... Appellant.
Tukaram S. Kalambe & Ors..... Respdts.
Shri Dilip Bodake for applicant.
CORAM: S.B.MHASE &
S.R.SATHE,JJ.
DATE : 12th July 2005.
| PC: | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Learned c | ounsel Shri Boda | ke makes a | |||
| statement | that | the | original | applicant | has | filed |
| Execution | Petition | before | the | Motor | Accidents | Claim |
| Tribunal | and | the | Insurance | Company | has | deposited |
| the amount. |
He | further | states | that as |
on to |
day the |
| Insurance | Company | has | not | filed | any | execution |
proceeding against the present applicant/appellant
and therefore, he may be allowed to withdraw the
| application | with | liberty | t | o | file | similar | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| application | with | similar | prayer | as | against | the | |
| Insurance | Company. | In | view | of |
the | statement | made |
by the learned counsel, the application is disposed
of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(S.R.SATHE)
(S.B.MHASE)
Shivajirao V. Kalange
Tukaram S. Kalambe & Ors.
S.B. MHASE
S.R. SATHE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court