Disposed
Jackie @ Sultana Ashok Daryani and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPPLN/6495/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6495 OF 2005
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.695 OF 1999
Jackie @ Sultana Ashok Dayanani Applicants vs. State of Maharashtra Respondents Mrs.Sharmila Kaushik for the applicant.
Ms.Usha Kejriwal, APP for the State.
CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & SHRI ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ .
DATED : 13th October 2005
P.C.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
| 2. | The | learned | counsel | for | the | applic | ant | Ms.Kaushik | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| states | that | she | will | file | vakal | atnama | for | the | appellants |
| in | due | course. | For | the | reasons | stated |
in | the | Criminal |
Application, appeal is restored to file. Office to
place this appeal for admission in due course.
(SMT. RANJANA DESAI,J.)
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Jackie @ Sultana Ashok Dayanani
State of Maharashtra
Ranjana Desai
Anoop V. Mota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court