This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
| IN THE HIGH COURT |
OF | JUDICATURE | AT | BOMBAY | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APPELLATE SIDE |
CRIMINAL | JU | RISDICTION | ||
| CRIMINAL APPLICATION IN CRIMINAL APPEAL |
NO.6222 NO.877 |
OF OF |
2005 2005 |
||
| Bhagwan | Shetiba Vitkar | .. Appellant | |||
| v/s. | |||||
| The State | of Maharashtra | .. Respondent | |||
| Through | Sr.P.I., | Daund | P.Stn. | ||
| Taluka | Daund, | Dist. | Pune. |
Mr.Ramesh K. Patil i/by M/s.Jay & Co. for the appellant. Mr.Y.S.Shinde, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.
CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI AND ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : 17th October, 2005.
P.C.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
delay is condoned. Application disposed of.
(SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.)
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Bhagwan Shetiba Vitkar
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjana Desai
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
