This judgment rejects a bail application by the applicant seeking release on grounds that other accused were released after three years in custody, noting the earlier bail rejection.
Application for bail rejected; hearing of the appeal expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4251 OF 2005
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.908 OF 2004
Imtiyaj Noorahamad Hundekari
Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent
Mr.P.P.Arjunwadkar for applicant. Ms.P.H.Kantharia, APP for State.
CORAM: S.S.PARKAR & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ.
September 22, 2005.
P.C.:
. Heard. This is the second application for bail. His earlier application for bail was rejected. The only ground on which the present application is pressed is that other accused persons have been released on bail and this applicant is in custody for
a period of three years. In that view of the matter
the hearing of the appeal can be expedited.
. In the result, this application is rejected
but the hearing of the appeal is expedited.
(S.S.PARKAR,J.)
(ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)
Imtiyaj Noorahamad Hundekari
The State of Maharashtra
S.S.Parkar
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
