Disposed
Rakesh Kumar Sharma v. the Union of India and Ors.
Bombay HCAPPLN/3113/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
CONTINUATION SHEET NO.FARAD CONTINUATION…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AJN
: 1 :
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3113 OF 2005
IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.943 OF 2004
---------------------------------------------------------
Office notes, office :
Memoranda of Coram, :
appearances, Court’s : Court’s or Judge’s Orders
orders or directions :
& Registrar’s orders. : .
---------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Anil Subramaniam for the
applicant.
Mr. J.C. Satpute for respondent
1.
Mr. A.M. Shringarpure, A.P.P.
for the State.
CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI &
ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
DATED: 24TH OCTOBER, 2005.
P.C.:-
Heard the learned counsel for the
parties.
For the reasons stated in the
application, writ petition is restored
to file. Office is directed to place
the writ petition on board for
admission in the week commencing from
21/11/2005.
AJN
: 2 :
The applicant shall serve copy of
the petition on the respondents.
Application is disposed of.
(SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.)
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Applicant
Respondent 1
State
Ranjana Desai
Anoop V. Mota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court