This criminal application was disposed of directing the release of the applicant-accused on bail pending the conviction appeal.
Release of the applicant-accused on bail by furnishing solvent security of Rs.40,000 and surety of two persons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3082 OF 2004 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.882 OF 2004.
Shamrao Bhau Gaikwad .. ............ .......... ......Applicant. V/s The State of Maharashtra.... ..... Respondent.
The State of Maharashtra.... ..... Respondent. Office Notes, Office ) Court's or Judge's Orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances, ) Court's orders or directions and ) Registrar's orders. )
Mr.Pratap Patil, Adv. for the Applicant.
Mr.R.S.Khadapkar, APP for the State.
CORAM:V.G. PALSHIKAR AND R.C. CHAVAN, JJ. 15.7.2005.
PC:
In view of the fact and circumstances
attending the conviction and pendency of appeal
we deem it just and proper to direct the release
of the applicantaccused on bail on furnishing
solvent security and surety of two persons in the sum of Rs.40,000/ each.
15/7/2005
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant-accused should be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal.
If so, what sum of security and surety bonds should the applicant furnish for release.
Whether the present facts and circumstances attending the conviction warrant the grant of bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shamrao Bhau Gaikwad
The State of Maharashtra
V.G. PALSHIKAR
R.C. CHAVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
