Disposed
Raju @ Appeal Anthony Shetty v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPPLN/2082/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
CONTINUATION SHEET NO.FARAD CONTINUATION…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AJN
: 1 :
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2082 OF 2005
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.338 OF 2005
---------------------------------------------------------
Office notes, office :
Memoranda of Coram, :
appearances, Court’s : Court’s or Judge’s Orders
orders or directions :
& Registrar’s orders. : .
---------------------------------------------------------
Mr. K.R. Tiwari i/b. M/s.
K.R. Tiwari & Co. for the
appellant.
Mr. A.S. Shitole, A.P.P. for
the State.
CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI &
ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
DATED: 10TH OCTOBER, 2005.
P.C.:-
Heard the learned counsel for the
parties.
For the reasons stated in the
application, delay is condoned.
Criminal application is disposed of.
(SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.)
AJN
: 2 :
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Ranjana Desai
Anoop V. Mota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court