Mrs.U.P.Hazarat,Hazarat and Co. v. M/S.Ndaram D.and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Suit dismissed for non-prosecution as plaintiffs' counsel had no instructions to pursue the action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 663 OF 1975
Mrs. Usha Paranjay Hazrat
& Ors. ... Plaintiffs.
vs.
Messrs. Nolaram Dulichand
& Ors. .. Defendants.
Mr. S. Rego i/by Crawford & Co.
for plaintiffs.
None for defendants.
CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J.
DATE : 2nd August,2005.
P.C.
. The learned counsel for the plaintiffs says
that he has no instructions to pursue the suit.
Suit dismissed for non-prosecuton.
Mrs. Usha Paranjay Hazrat & Ors.
Messrs. Nolaram Dulichand & Ors.
S.U.KAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court