Suit dismissed due to non-appearance of plaintiff's witness and counsel, resulting in no evidence being led to prove the plaintiff's case.
Suit dismissed under Order 9 Rule 8 CPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 516 OF 1975
Normandie Co-op. Housing Soc.Ltd. .. Plaintiff
versus
M/s.Mahindra Builders & ors. .. Defendants
None for the plaintiff.
Mr.MPS Rao i/b M/s.Rustomji & Ginwala for the
defendnat nos.6 to 8.
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK,J.
DATED : 7th July 2005.
P.C.:
1. The first witness of the plaintiff is under
cross-examination. On the last two dates, the
witness not present in the Court and therefore,
matter was adjourned at the request of the learned
counsel for the plaintiff. Even today, witness is
absent. Nobody is present for the plaintiffs. In
the circumstances, suit of the plaintiff is dismissed
under Order 9 Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
D.G. KARNIK, J
1 provisions across 1 enactments
D.G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court