Kashinathsinh Trimbaksinh Pardeshi v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/2318/2004
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
1
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
¶3
APPELLATE SIDE
¶4
WRIT PETITION NO. 5885 OF 2004
¶5
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
¶6
___________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office MemorandaCourt’s or Judge’s order
appearances, Court’s orders or
directions and Registrar’s
orders.
¶7
Ms. A.V. Khanolkar for Petitioner.
¶8
Coram: J.N. PATEL, J.
¶9
Date : 24th July, 2006.
¶10
P.C.
¶11
.Rule.
¶12
.Ruleoninterimrelief
returnable six weeks. In the
meantime, the ad-interim order shall
continue to operate.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Farad
Coram
AI extract
J.N. PATEL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Sayyad Iqbal Sayyad Ibrahim Vs the Municipal Corp.for Malegaon City and Ors.
The Chairman, Mah.Public Service Commission and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Shri.Ramniwas M.Agarwal and Ors. Vs Pune Muncipal Corporation Shiwajinagar and Ors.
Ujwala Nivrutti Chavan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.