Petitioners filed a writ petition. Counsel stated the petition had become infructuous. The court discharged the rule and disposed of the petition without substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1969 OF 1994
Gurukrupa Mahila Audhyogic
Utpadak Sahakari Sanstha (Maryadit).. Petitioners.
V/s
State of Maharashtra & Ors... Respondents
Mr.H.N.Kore for the Petitioners.
Ms.S.M.Dandekar, AGP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.A.BOBDE, JJ.
DATE : 7.10.2004.
P.C.:
1. The learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that
the Petition has become infructuous. In view thereof
Rule stands discharged. Petition stands disposed of.
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.A.BOBDE, J.)
Gurukrupa Mahila Audhyogic Utpadak Sahakari Sanstha (Maryadit)
State of Maharashtra
S.Radhakrishnan
S.A.Bobde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court