The High Court of Bombay dismissed the second appeal, having found it abated in principle. This was an *in camera* summary order recording that the appeal could not survive against non-abated respondents following the dismissal against the sole plaintiff.
Second Appeal dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET SECOND APPEAL NO.613 OF 1987
Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
CORAM: A.S.OKA, J.
DATED: AUGUST 11, 2004.
P.C.:
that the Second Appeal has been dismissed
as abated as against the Respondent No.1.
Appeal is dismissed with no order as to
costs.
Judge.
Respondent No.1
Respondent No.2
Respondent No.3
A.S.Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
