This application sought transfer of a Motor Accident Claims Petition from the Tribunal at Panaji to the Tribunal at Pune. The court allowed the transfer and directed the Pune Tribunal to issue notices to all opponents.
Transfer of the Claim Petition from the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Panaji to the Tribunal at Pune.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.85 OF 1995
............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
............................................................. Mr.S.B.Deshmukh h/f A.V.Anturkar for the Applicant. Mr.C.N.Chavan for the Respondent. CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. DATED: AUGUST 19, 2004.
P.C.:
2
| Petition | in | th | e | Motor Accide |
nt | Claims |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tribunal, | Panaji |
to | the Motor |
Accident | ||
| Claims | Tribunal | at | Pune. The |
Applicants | ||
| are | resident | of | Taluka Haveli, |
District | ||
| Pune. | The | Claim | Petition is |
filed | for |
|
| claiming | com |
pen | sation | on account |
of | death |
| of | husband | of | the | Applicant No |
.1. | The |
| Claim | Petition | was | filed in the |
Tribunal | ||
| at | Panaji as |
the | accident |
took | place |
within the jurisdiction of the said
Tribunal.
directed to issue notice to all the
Opponents in the Claim Petition.
as expeditiously as possible. No order as
to costs.
Judge.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the claim petition filed before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Panaji should be transferred to the Tribunal at Pune given the residence of the applicant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Farad
Respondent No.2
Respondent No.3
Respondent No.4
A.S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
