This Family Court Appeal was admitted and allowed on the basis of signed consent terms understood and agreed to by the appellant present in person.
Appellant to be put in possession; decree to be drawn accordingly as per consent terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, CIVIL JURISDICTION
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.59 OF 2004
Ms.Manisha Girish Pai.....Appellant
Versus
Shri Laxman V. Pai & Anr.....Respondents
Mr.S.J. Chitale with Mr. Sandeep A. Bhagwat, for the Appellant. Respondent No.1 present in person.
Mr. Vishwanath Talkute, for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 1st September, 2004
P.C.
| together | with their |
respectiv | e Counsel. |
Consent | terms | signed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| by | the | appellant and |
the | respondents | and | by their |
respective |
Counsel taken on record and marked "X" for identification.
Authenticated copy be supplied to the parties.
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Ms. Manisha Girish Pai
Shri Laxman V. Pai
F.I. Rebello
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
