Allowed
Pushpa v. Gidwani v Lachibai Murlidhar Harjani and Ors.
Bombay HCCAF/4133/2004
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4133 OF 2004
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.1280 OF 2004
------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s Orders
of Coram, appearances, Court’s
Orders or directions and
Registrar’s Orders
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.G.S.Godbole for applicant
Ms.Sariya Medrulla for respondent
CORAM : P.V.KAKADE,J.
DATE : 16TH DECEMBER, 2004
P.C.:
1. Heard both sides.
2. In view of the facts and
circumstances the application is
made absolute in terms of prayer
clauses (a), (b) and (c) and stands
disposed of.
Mr.G.S.Godbole's client
Ms.Sariya Medrulla's client
P.V.KAKADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court