In criminal appeal no.553 of 1995, the High Court dismissed the appeal since the original respondent (accused) had died, causing the matter to abate.
Appeal abated due to death of respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.553 OF 1995
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, office Court’s or Judge’s orders
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court’s
orders or directions
and Registrar’s orders
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.A.S.Shitole, A.P.P. for State
Mr.Mangesh Shirsat Adv. for
Respondent
CORAM:SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.
DATE :DECEMBER 6,2004
. Mr.Shirsat, the learned advocate
for the respondent i.e. original
accused states that the respondent
i.e. original accused Dr.Parshuram
Bakaram Badwaik has expired on 23rd
February, 1999. He has produced the
original copy of death certificate
for perusal of the Court and a xerox
copy of death certificate is taken
on record and marked ‘X’ for
identification. In view of these
facts, this appeal abates.
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
State
Dr. Parshuram Bakaram Badwaik
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court