Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant, though present, failed to produce the impugned order or any certified/ordinary copy despite filing since December 2000.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution for want of production of the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.2 OF 2001
............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : JAUNAURY 28,2005.
| P.C.: 1. |
None appears for the Appellant. By |
|---|---|
| this | Appeal the challenge is to the order |
| dated | 25th December 2000 by which the |
| learned | Trial Judge has declined to grant |
| ad-interim | relief in favour of the |
| Appellant. | The Appeal was moved before |
| the | learned Vacation Judge on 2nd January |
| 2001. | The learned Vacation Judge declined |
| to | grant anyad-interim relief. |
| Thereafter, | this matter was not moved for |
| admission. | Though the Appeal was filed in |
| December | 2000 till today neither certified |
| copy | nor ordinary copy of the impugned |
| order | is produced by the Appellant. |
| Hence, | I have no option but to dismiss the |
| Appeal | for non prosecution. Appeal is |
| dismissed will be no |
for want of prosecution. There order as to costs. |
Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal filed without production of the impugned order deserves admission.
A.S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
