Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1419/DLI/2016 of Amit Chaturvedi v. The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

ATFP23 Jul 2024FPA-PMLA-1419/DLI/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Appellate Tribunal, PMLA, disposed of appeals filed by the Chaturvedi family and Shamken International Ltd. challenging an Adjudicating Authority order. The Tribunal addressed the status of seized properties, some of which were attached and relied upon in ongoing prosecution complaints. It directed the respondent to retain only those items certified in the attachment order and allows the retur

What did the court decide?

Allowed respondent ED to retain properties listed in Attachment Order OC 642/2016; directed return of unattached/unrelied-upon seized items within eight weeks.

FPA-PMLA-1419/DLI/2016 of Amit Chaturvedi Vs. The… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | ATFP (2024)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI

¶2

1.	MP-PMLA-10931/DLI/2023 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-2655/DLI/2016 (Exem.) FPA-PMLA-1417/DLI/2016
	Sh. H. B. Chaturvedi …	Appellant
2.	MP-PMLA-2656/DLI/2016 (Exem.) FPA-PMLA-1418/DLI/2016
	Neelima Chaturvedi …	Appellant
3.	MP-PMLA-2657/DLI/2016 (Exem.) FPA-PMLA-1419/DLI/2016
	Amit Chaturvedi …	Appellant
4.	MP-PMLA-2658/DLI/2016 (Exem.) FPA-PMLA-1420/DLI/2016
	Anju Chaturvedi …	Appellant
5.	MP-PMLA-2659/DLI/2016 (Exem.) FPA-PMLA-1421/DLI/2016
	M/s. Shamken International Ltd. …	Appellant
6.	MP-PMLA-2660/DLI/2016 (Exem.) FPA-PMLA-1422/DLI/2016
	Sanjay Chaturvedi …	Appellant
	Versus
	The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi …	Respondent
Advo	cates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For th	e Appellants : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sat Mr. Udit Sharma,	eja, Adv. Adv.
For th	e Respondent : Ms. Anubha Bhar Mr. Khushal Sain	adwaj, Adv. i, Adv.
COR	AM
SHRI	G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER

¶3

ORDER

¶4

23.07.2024

¶5

The appeals under consideration have been filed by the appellants against the order dated 17.06.2016 passed by Ld. Adjudicating Authority

¶6

FPA-PMLA-1417-1422/DLI/2016

¶7

Page 1 of 15

¶8

(AA), Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, in the matter of Original Application (O.A) 17/2014 filed by Directorate of Enforcement against these appellants. The appellants have, inter-alia, sought for quashing, setting aside and cancelling the impugned order dated 17.06.2016.

¶9

Brief facts of the case

¶10

2. It is revealed from the record that the Central Bureau of Investigation (C.B.I) registered 8 Regular Cases (R.C) against Sh. H.B. Chaturvedi, Chairman cum Managing Director, Amit Chaturvedi, joint managing Director, Sanjay Chaturvedi, Director, Sumit Chaturvedi, Director and Parvin Juneja, Director (Corporate Finance) of M/s Shamken Spinners Ltd., M/s Shamken Multifab Ltd., M/s Dwarkadish Spinners Ltd. and M/s Shamken Cotsyn Ltd. amongst others.

¶11

3. It is also revealed from the record that based on these 8 R.Cs, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) registered 8 ECIRs on different dates in the year 2009 being u/s 120-B of IPC,1860 and section 8 of Prevention of Corruption Act,1988 are scheduled offences under the PMLA,2002 in the Delhi Zonal office of Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi against the aforesaid suspects/accused persons for the commission of offence u/s 3 of the PMLA and accordingly cases were taken up for further investigation under PMLA, 2002.

¶12

4. It is also seen from the record that initially the present appellants preferred appeals against order dated 16.10.2014 passed by the learned Adjudicating Authority (hereinafter referred to as “AA” ) in O.A No. 17/2014

¶13

FPA-PMLA-1417-1422/DLI/2016

¶14

Page 2 of 15

¶15

under section 17(4) of PMLA, 2002. This tribunal vide its order dated 01.01.2016 set aside the order dated 16.10.2014 and remanded the matter to the AA for re-adjudication with certain directions.

¶16

5. The Ld. AA, in compliance with the said order of the Appellate Tribunal, re-adjudicated the O.A and re-confirmed the same on 17.06.2016. It is this order which is under challenge in the present appeals.

¶17

6. It is revealed from the written submission filed by the respondent ED that the following documents/items were recovered, seized and restrained from these premises as detailed below:

¶18

Sl.	Places of search		Items recovered/seized
No.
1.	B-7 &8 UPSIDC Industrial Area, Nandgaon, Kosi Kalan, Distt. Mathura U.P(search)		NIL.
2.	B-9 UPSIDC Industrial Area, Kosi Nandgaon, Kosi	i.	One file of invoices of M/s Shamken International Ltd. MarkedA withpages1to 336
	Kalan, Distt. Mathura U.P (search)	ii.	One file of ER-1 returns of M/s Shamken International Ltd. MarkedB withpaged1to143
		iii.	One Register Marked C with pages1to44
		iv.	One Register marked D with writtenpages1to 39
		v.	One Register marked E with writtenpages1to12
		vi.	One register marked F with writtenpages1to19
		vii.	One bunch of miscellaneous loose papers marked G with pages1to 58
		viii.	One bunch of Personal Ledger accounts etc. marked H with pages 1 to 39
		ix.	One envelope with loose sheets markedH withpages1to 5
		x.	One envelopewith loose sheets

¶19

FPA-PMLA-1417-1422/DLI/2016

¶20

Page 3 of 15

¶21

1.	97 D Eastern Avenue, Sainik Farms, New Delhi-110062 (search)	xi. xii.	marked Jwithpages1to 9 One bunch of loose sheets markedA1 withpages1to 62 One bunch of loose sheets markedA2withpages1to 64
		xiii.	One bunch of loose sheets markedA3withpages1to41
		xiv.	One bunch of loose sheets markedA4 withpages1to 68
		xv.	One bunch of loose sheets markedA5withpages1to 21
		xvi.	One bunch of loose sheets markedA6withpages1to17
		xvii.	One bunch of loose sheets markedA7 withpages1to 37
		xviii.	One bunch of loose sheets markedA8withpages1to73
		xix.	One Lenovo Laptop Hard-disk markedA9
		xx.	One Gold watch of Rolex marked A 10
		xxi.	One Box marked A 11 containing 25 items of Jewellery worth Rs. 36,41,088/- as per Annexure J
		xxii.	Restraint Order marked A 12 (under section 17 (1a) of PMLA) on a drawer of a closet in the
			master bedroom (1^stfloor) of 97 D Sanik Farms New Delhi for restraint on the RCs of 3 motor vehicles-
			a) Innova- Reg. no. – DL3CBX0843
			b) Scorpion- Reg no.- DL3CAS4213
			c) Elantra- Reg. no. DL3CBP8137
4.	98, Eastern Avenue Sainik farms, New	xxiii.	Jewellery as per Annexure J valued atRs.1,49,50,200/-
	Delhi 110062 (search)	xxiv.	Cash as per Annexure C of Rs. 10,50,000/-
		xxv.	Restraint Order u/s 17 (1a) of PMLA, 2002 imposed upon the almirah of dressing room of Sh. H.B Chaturvedi at the Ground floor of 98 Eastern Avenue
			Sainik Farms, New Delhi for
			restraint on the following vehicles
			a) Honda City no. DL3C 8E 5465
			b) Skoda Superb Elegance no-
			DL8CZ0811

¶22

FPA-PMLA-1417-1422/DLI/2016

¶23

Page 4 of 15

¶24

			c) Renault Duster RXL no.- DL8CZ9910
			d) Mercedes Bez no. – DL3CH0394
5.	E-47, greater Kailash II First Floor, New	xxvi.	One register marked A with writtenpages1to 32
	Delhi 110048 (search)	xxvii.	One visiting card of South Asian FoodandHospitalityPvt. Ltd
		xxviii	One blank envelope of Shamken
6.	II A/ 265 Nehru Negar, Ghaziabad, U.P. (search)	. xxix.	One bunch of loose sheets page 1 to 11
7.	B-348 Ground Floor, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi(survey)	xxx.	NIL
8.	Plot no. A-20, Block B-1 Mohan Cooperative Indl. Estate, Mathura Road, New Delhi (survey)	xxxi.	NIL
9.	Flat no. 2193, Sector C pocket 2, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi (survey)	xxxii.	NIL

¶25

7. It is also revealed from record that during the pendency of these appeals the Enforcement Directorate issued Provisional Attachment Order (PAO) no. 07/2016 dated 15.09.2016 issued u/s 5(1) PMLA, 2002. In the said PAO the seized valuables i.e. Indian currencies, jewelleries and vehicles were also provisionally attached.

¶26

8. Subsequent to the passing of the PAO no. 07/2016 dated 15.09.2016, the Enforcement Directorate filed Original Complaint (O.C) no 642/2016 u/s 8(1) of PMLA, 2002 for confirmation of the said PAO which was confirmed u/s 8(3) of PMLA, 2002 by the Ld. AA on dated 03.02.2017. All the appellants herein have also challenged the order of confirmation of O.C dated 03.02.2017 vide Appeal nos. FPA-PMLA-1699&1701/DLI/2017, FPA-PMLA-1679/DLI/2017, FPA-PMLA-1700/DLI/2017, FPA-PMLA-

¶27

FPA-PMLA-1417-1422/DLI/2016

¶28

Page 5 of 15

¶29

1678/DLI/2017, FPA-PMLA-1695/DLI/2017, FPA-PMLA-1702/DLI/2017 respectively and these appeals are pending consideration.

¶30

9. As per the written submission filed by the respondent ED, the details of movable/immovable properties attached under PAO 07/2016 dated 15.09.2016 and confirmed by Ld. AA on 03.02.2017 are as below:

¶31

Sl. No.	Name of the party		Details of the Property
1.	Sh. H.B Chaturvedi, Sh. Sanjay Chaturvedi, Sh. Amit	a.	Jewellery as per Annexure J valued at Rs. 1,49,50,200/- of Panchnama
	Chaturvedi 98,	b.	Cash as per annexure
	Estern Avenue		C of Rs. 10,50,000/-
	Sainik Farms, New Delhi, 10062	c.	Honda City no. DL3C 8E 5465
		d.	Skoda Superb Elegance no. DL8CZ0811
		e.	Renault Duster RXL no. DL8CZ9910
		f.	Mercedes Benz no. DL3CH0394
2.	Sh. H.B Chaturvedi, Sh. Sanjay Chaturvedi Sh. Amit	a.	One Box marked A11 containing 25 items of Jewellery worth Rs. 36,41,088/- asper Annexure J
	Chaturvedi, 97-D,	b.	One Gold watch of Rolex make
	Eastern Avenue	c.	Innova- Reg. no. DL3CBX0843
	Sainik Farms, New	d.	Scorpio—Reg. no. DL3CAS4213
	Delhi 110062.	e.	Elantra- Reg. no. DL3CBP8137
3.	Mrs. Maharani Chaturvedi w/o Sh. H.B Chaturvedi,		98 Eastern Avenue Sainik Farms, New Delhi 110062
	Mrs. Nelima Chaturvedi w/o Sh. Amit Chaturvedi
4.	Sh. Sohit Chaturvedi s/o Charturvedi, Sh. Sanjay Chaturvedi, Eshan Chaturvedi		97-D Eastern Avenue Sainik Farms, New Delhi 110062
	s/o Sh. Amit Chaturvedi
5.	Shamken Cotysyn Limited (SCL)	a.	A/c No. 20342000000359 HDFC Bank, B 6/3, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi- 59

¶32

FPA-PMLA-1417-1422/DLI/2016

¶33

Page 6 of 15

¶34

		b.	A/c No. 05032320000593 HDFC Bank, B 6/3 Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi- 59
6.	Shamken Multifab Ltd.		Shamken House, B- 1/A-20, Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate, Mathura Road, New Delhi- 110044
7.	Shamken Multifab Limited (SML)	a.	A/c No. 0417984224 Citi Bank, N.A., Global consumer Bank, Jeevan Bharti Building, 124, Connaught Circus, New Delhi- 110001
		b.	A/c No. 0422292225 Citi Bank N.A., Global consumer Bank, Jeevan Bharti Building, 124, Connaught Circus New Delhi- 110001
		c.	A/c no 094-252061-001 HSBC Bank, The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Birla Towers, 25 Barakhamba road, new delhi- 110001
		d.	A/c No. 011105000129220 of the IDBI Bank, Surya Kiran Building, Ground floor, 19, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi
		e.	A/c No. 0011778000000019 of IDBI Bank, Surya Kiran Building Ground Floor, 19, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi
		f.	A/c No. 0384-03003851-195001 of Catholic Syrian Bank, Kosi Kalan, Mathura District, U.P 281 403
8.	Shamken Spinners Limited (SSL)	a.	A/c No. 0421866228 Citi Bank, N.A., Global Consumer Bank, Jeevan Bharti Building, 124, Connaught Circus, New Delhi – 110001
		b.	A/c No. 051-219681-001 HSBC Bank, The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Birla Towers, 25 Barakhamba road, New Delhi- 110001
		c.	A/s No. 20342000000438 HDFC

¶35

FPA-PMLA-1417-1422/DLI/2016

¶36

Page 7 of 15

¶37

			Bank, B 6/3, Safdurjung Enclave, New Delhi- 59
9.	M/s Shamken International Ltd.	a.	A/c No. 18250200000134 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi
10.	H.B Chaturvedi	b.	A/c No. 004601000683 of ICICI Bank, 9 A, Phelps Building, Connaught Place, New Delhi- 110001
		c.	A/c No. 18250100001667 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi
11.	Amit Chaturvedi		A/c No. 18250100000431 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi
12.	Neelima Chaturvedi	a.	A/c No. 18250310017562 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi
		b.	A/c No. 18250310017579 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi
		c.	A/c No. 18250310018606 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi
		d.	A/c No. 18250310018637 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi
		e.	A/c No. 18250310018651 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi
		f.	A/c No. 18250310026496 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi
		g.	A/c No. 18250310026502 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi
		h.	A/c No. 18250310026519 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi
		i.	A/c No. 18250310026526 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi
		j.	A/c No. 18250310026533 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi
		k.	A/c No. 18250310026540 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road,

¶38

FPA-PMLA-1417-1422/DLI/2016

¶39

Page 8 of 15

¶40

			New Delhi
		l. m.	A/c No. 18250310026557 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi A/c No. 18250310026564 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi
		n.	A/c No. 18250310026571 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi
		o.	A/c No. 18250310026588 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi
		p.	A/c No. 18250310033104 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi
		q. r.	A/c No. 18250310042656 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi A/c No. 18250310051023 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi
13.	Sanjay Chaturvedi		A/c. No. 52110291332 of Standard Chartered Bank, 7A, DLF Cyber City, Gurgoan- 122002
14.	Sohit Chaturvedi	a.	A/c No. 164701500127 ICICI Ban, E-147 Opposite PVR Cinema, Saket, New Delhi – 17
15.	Anju Chaturvedi	b.	A/c No. 18250310017555 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi
		c.	A/c No. 18250310017586 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi
		d.	A/c No. 18250310018620 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi
		e.	A/c No. 18250310018613 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi
		f.	A/c No. 18250310018644 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi
		g.	A/c No. 18250310042601 of UCO Bank Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi

¶41

FPA-PMLA-1417-1422/DLI/2016

¶42

Page 9 of 15

¶43

16.	Kotwan Trading Pvt.	A/c No. 007010300021739 of
	Ltd.	Axis Bank Stateman House, 148,
		Barakhamba Road, Connaught
		Place, New Delhi- 110001

¶44

10. It is further disclosed in the said written submission that the

¶45

following properties have not been attached in the PAO no. 07/2016 though seized in the O.A.

¶46

Sl.No.	Place of	Total No.	Items
	Search/Survey		recovered/seized
1.	B-9 UPSIDC Industrial Area, Kosi Nandgaon, Kosi Kalan, Distt, Mathura U.P	1	One file of invoices of M/s Shamken International Ltd. Marked A with pages 1to 336
	(search)	2	One file of ER-1 returns of M/s Shamken International Ltd Marked B with pages 1to143
		3	One Register Marked Cwithpages1to44
		4	One register marked D with written pages 1 to 39
		5	One register marked E with written pages 1 to12
		6	One Register marked F with written pages 1 to19
		7	One bunch of miscellaneous loose papers marked G with pages1to 58
		8	One bunch of Personal Ledger accounts etc. marked H withpages1to 39
		9	One envelop with loose sheets marked H with pages 1 to 5
		10	One envelop with loose sheets marked J with loose sheets marked Jwithpages1

¶47

FPA-PMLA-1417-1422/DLI/2016

¶48

Page 10 of 15

¶49

			to 9
2.	97 D Eastern Avenue, Sainik Farms, New Delhi –	11	One bunch of loose sheets marked A1 withpages1to 62
	110062 (search)	12	One bunch of loose sheets marked A2 withpages1to 64
		13	One bunch of loose sheets marked A3 withpages1to41
		14	One bunch of loose sheets marked A4 withpages1to 68
		15	One bunch of loose sheets marked A5 withpages1to 21
		16	One bunch of loose sheets marked A6 withpages1to17
		17	One bunch of loose sheets marked A7 withpages1to 37
		18	One bunch of loose sheets marked A8 withpages1to73
		19	One Lenovo Laptop Hard-disk markedA9
4	E-47, Greater Kailash II First Floor, New Delhi	20	One register marked A with written pages 1 to 32
	110048 (search)	21	One visiting card of South Asian Food and HospitalityPvt. Ltd.
		22	One Blank envelope of Shamken
5	II A/265 Nehru Nagar, Ghaziabad U.P(search)	23	One bunch of loose sheets pages 1 to 11

¶50

11. During the pendency of the present appeals, the appellants namely Amit Chaturvedi, Sanjay Chaturvedi and Sumit Chaturvedi filed an application for their substitution in place of the appellant late Sh. H.B. Chaturvedi, appellant in appeal no. FPA-PMLA-1417/DLI/2016 who expired on 15.12.2022. The said application was filed on 07.02.2023. copy of the said application was duly served on the Ld. counsel of the respondent ED. No reply has been filed. The said application was heard

¶51

FPA-PMLA-1417-1422/DLI/2016

¶52

Page 11 of 15

¶53

and considered. The legal heirs are already on record through their respective separate appeals. Keeping in view the contentions made in the application and in the interest of justice, the said application bearing no. MP-PMLA-10931/DLI/2023 in appeal no. PMLA-1417/DLI/2017 is allowed and disposed of. The legal heirs are hereby substituted in place of deceased appellant late Sh. H.B. Chaturvedi.

¶54

12. During the course of proceedings, the respondent has filed written submissions wherein at para no. vii has stated as below:

¶55

“The contents of the para are wrong, false and hence are denied. It is contended that the properties that have been seized in the search u/s 17 of PMLA were found to be related to crime or “Proceeds of Crime” in terms of Section 2(1)(u) of PMLA which reads as “proceeds of crime” means any property derived or obtained directly or indirectly, by any person as a result of criminal activity relating to a scheduled offence or the value of any such property”. Therefore, an application u/s 17(4) of the PMLA was filed and Ld. Adjudicating Authority had allowed retention of the same vide order dated 16.10.2014 and 17.06.2016 as the investigation was going on. During further investigation under the provisions of the PMLA, the role of the defendants was further established in the offence of the money laundering, therefore, movable/immovable properties were attached vide PAO No. 07/2016 along with the properties seized u/s 17(4) of PMLA during search. So presently it can be construed that the appeal has become infructuous.”

¶56

FPA-PMLA-1417-1422/DLI/2016

¶57

Page 12 of 15

¶58

13. Heard the learned counsels for both sides. On perusal of the record, written submission of respondent ED and the contentions made by the Ld. counsel for both the parties it appears that the properties, the details of which are listed as per the list made in the table at para no. 2 above were seized during the course of surveys/searches at different premises/places. The Ld. Counsel for the ED submitted that out of the seized properties listed at para no. 2 above, some of them which are listed in table at para no. 3 are attached vide O.C No. 642/2016 and confirmed on 03.02.2017. It is also contended by the Ld. counsel for the respondent ED that the properties listed in table at para no. 4 are not attached in the said O.C. On the basis of the aforesaid submissions, it is contented by the Ld. counsel for the respondent ED that these O.As are liable to be dismissed as infructuous.

¶59

14. During the course of argument, it is also contented by the Ld. Counsel for the respondent that 8 Prosecution Complaints have also been filed against the appellant in which Panchnamas dated 23.06.2014 drawn during the Search/Survey proceedings were made as relied upon documents before the Ld. Special Judge under PMLA, 2002 and that the said documents and items seized during the searches may be called during the trial of said Prosecution Complaints. On the aforesaid grounds, it is prayed by the Ld. Counsel for the respondent to retain all the seized documents until the completion of the criminal trial pending before the Ld. Special Judge under PMLA, 2002.

¶60

15. To the above, it was orally contended by the Ld. counsel for the appellants that the appellants have no objection if the articles which are not attached are returned to the appellants.

¶61

FPA-PMLA-1417-1422/DLI/2016

¶62

Page 13 of 15

¶63

Discussion and findings:

¶64

16. It is an admitted fact that during the pendency of present appeals, PAO no. 07/2016 dated 15.09.2016 issued u/s 5(1) of PMLA, 2002 has been passed by the Enforcement Directorate attaching some of the properties involved in the present appeals.

¶65

17. I have considered the submissions made by the parties. The questions of law raised in the appeals has not been gone into. The only question that has been considered in the present order is whether the present appeals can be continued in view of the PAO no. 07/2016 dated 15.09.2016 passed by Enforcement Directorate for attachment of the properties including articles, jewellery, movable and immovable properties as reflected in the above tables.

¶66

18. As per the argument advanced by the Ld. counsel for the respondent that the respondent ED has stated that they have already filed 8 Prosecution Complaints in which the Panchnamas prepared during the course of Survey/Searches on 23.06.2014 are part of relied upon documents and it is also contended that the said documents and items seized during the search may be called during the trial of the said Prosecution Complaints. It is seen from the record that some of the seized articles/documents/movable and immovable properties are part of the PAO and confirmed by the Ld. AA. This being the situation, these appeals can be disposed of with following directions:

¶67

i. The respondent ED is allowed to retain those properties/articles /items /Electronic device/documents/jewellery and other valuables which are part of the O.C bearing no. 642/2016

¶68

FPA-PMLA-1417-1422/DLI/2016

¶69

Page 14 of 15

¶70

arising out of PAO no. 7/2016 and also relied on by the respondent ED in the Prosecution Complaints pending before the Ld. Special Judge under PMLA, 2002. However, the copies of the documents, clone copy of the data recovered from the electronic device i.e. Lenovo laptop hard-disk be supplied to the appellants, if already not supplied, within eight weeks, provided the appellants apply for the same.

¶71

ii. If any of the properties/ articles/ items/ electronic device /documents / jewellery and other valuables which are seized and allowed to be retained by the Ld. AA but neither attached nor relied upon in the Prosecution Complaints, the same be returned within eight weeks to the appellants.

¶72

19. The appeals and pending applications are accordingly disposed of.

¶73

Pronounced in open court.

¶74

The records be cosigned to record room after appeal period.

¶75

(G. C. Mishra) Member

New Delhi

23^rd July, 2024

‘AK’

FPA-PMLA-1417-1422/DLI/2016

¶80

Page 15 of 15

FPA-PMLA-1419/DLI/2016 of Amit Chaturvedi v. The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1419/DLI/2016 of Amit Chaturvedi v. The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases