Disposed
FPA-PMLA-688/PTN/2014 of Bindi Devi v/s The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Patna
ATFPFPA-PMLA-688/PTN/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Bindi Devi V/s The Joint Director…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. MP-PMLA-1155/PTN/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-646/PTN/2014
Mantu Yadav @ Raj Kumar Yadav … Appellant 2. MP-PMLA-1251/PTN/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-688/PTN/2014 Bindi Devi … Appellant Versus The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Patna … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : None For the Respondent : None CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER
26.02.2021
FPA-PMLA-646/PTN/2014 & FPA-PMLA-688/PTN/2014
The matters are listed on 05th March, 2021 but due to pandemic COVID-19 situation and in view of notice dated 26.02.2021 read with earlier notifications dated 16.03.2020, 23.03.2020, 26.03.2020, 15.04.2020, 04.05.2020, 18.05.2020, 30.06.2020, 16.07.2020, 31.07.2020, 17.08.2020, 02.09.2020, 08.09.2020, 30.09.2020, 15.10.2020, 29.10.2020, 13.11.2020, 27.11.2020, 31.12.2020, 15.01.2021, 29.01.2021 & 12.02.2021 issued by Appellate Tribunal regarding suspension of functioning of Appellate Tribunal, the matters are adjourned to 07th July, 2021.
It is to clarify that the interim order of stay/status quo, if any, already passed, to continue till the next date of hearing.
(Roma Ambwani) Registrar-In-Charge
New Delhi, 26th February, 2021 ‘D’
FPA-PMLA-646/PTN/2014 & FPA-PMLA-688/PTN/2014
Page 1 of 1
Mantu Yadav @ Raj Kumar Yadav
Bindi Devi
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Patna
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court