The Appellate Tribunal adjourned multiple PMLA matters pending appeals to 12th April, 2021, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and suspension notifications regarding Tribunal functioning. Existing interim stay orders to continue until the next hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-PMLA-3809/MUM/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1988/MUM/2017 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Satyen Suresh Gathani |
… | Appellant /applicant |
Versus |
||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (2) MP-PMLA-3965/MUM/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2047/MUM/2017 |
||
| Raj Agarwal |
… | Appellant /applicant |
Versus |
||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (3) MP-PMLA-3967/MUM/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2048/MUM/2017 |
||
| Pankaj Agarwal |
… | Appellant /applicant |
Versus |
||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (4) MP-PMLA-3986/MUM/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2059/MUM/2017 |
||
| Kailash Chandan |
… | Appellant /applicant |
Versus |
||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (5) FPA-PMLA-2108/MUM/2017 | ||
| Bharat Rajmal Shah |
… | Appellant /applicant |
Versus |
||
| The Deputy Director, | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
FPA-PMLA-1988, 2047, 2048, 2059, 2108, 2004-2008/MUM/2017
Page 1 of 3
| (6) MP-PMLA-3929/MUM/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3930/MUM/2017 (Exm.) FPA-PMLA-2004/MUM/2017 |
||
|---|---|---|
| M/s. Worldwide Oilfield Machine Pvt. Ltd. |
… | Appellant /applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (7) MP-PMLA-3931/MUM/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3932/MUM/2017 (Exm.) FPA-PMLA-2005/MUM/2017 |
||
| Mangesh Annachhatara | … | Appellant /applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (8) MP-PMLA-3933/MUM/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3934/MUM/2017 (Exm.) FPA-PMLA-2006/MUM/2017 |
||
| Sudhir Puranik | … | Appellant /applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (9) MP-PMLA-3937/MUM/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3938/MUM/2017 (Exm.) FPA-PMLA-2007/MUM/2017 |
||
| Rahul Ranka | … | Appellant /applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (10) MP-PMLA-3935/MUM/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3936/MUM/2017 (Exm.) FPA-PMLA-2008/MUM/2017 |
||
| Dinesh Mehta | … | Appellant /applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| , Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
FPA-PMLA-1988, 2047, 2048, 2059, 2108, 2004-2008/MUM/2017
Page 2 of 3
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : None For the Respondent : None CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 15.01.2021
FPA-PMLA-1988, 2047, 2048, 2059, 2108, 2004-2008/MUM/2017
The matters are listed on 21st January, 2021 but due to pandemic COVID-19 situation and in view of notification dated 15.01.2021 read with earlier notifications dated 16.03.2020, 23.03.2020, 26.03.2020, 15.04.2020, 04.05.2020, 18.05.2020, 30.06.2020, 16.07.2020, 31.07.2020, 17.08.2020, 02.09.2020, 08.09.2020, 30.09.2020, 15.10.2020, 29.10.2020, 13.11.2020 and 27.11.2020 and 31.12.2020 issued by Appellate Tribunal regarding suspension of functioning of Appellate Tribunal, the matters are adjourned to 12th April, 2021.
It is to clarify that the interim order of stay/status quo, if any, already passed, to continue till the next date of hearing.
(Roma Ambwani) Registrar-in- Charge
New Delhi, 15th January, 2021 M
FPA-PMLA-1988, 2047, 2048, 2059, 2108, 2004-2008/MUM/2017
Page 3 of 3
Satyen Suresh Gathani
Raj Agarwal
Pankaj Agarwal
Kailash Chandan
Bharat Rajmal Shah
M/s. Worldwide Oilfield Machine Pvt. Ltd.
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
