Matters listed before the Appellate Tribunal were adjourned to 28th April 2021 due to the pandemic and suspension of functioning of the Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. MP-PMLA-2666/JL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1385/JL/2016 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Shri Kamaljit Singh Hayer | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar |
… | Respondent |
| 2. MP-PMLA-2756/JL/2016 (Stay) MP-PMLA-2757/JL/2016 (A.D.) FPA-PMLA-1392/JL/2016 |
||
| Smt. Swaran Luthra | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar |
… | Respondent |
| 3. MP-PMLA-2758/JL/2016 (Stay) MP-PMLA-2759/JL/2016 (A.D.) FPA-PMLA-1393/JL/2016 |
||
| Smt. Rekha Rani | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar |
… | Respondent |
| 4. MP-PMLA-2668/JL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1386/JL/2016 |
||
| Shri Davinder Singh Nirwal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar |
… | Respondent |
| 5. MP-PMLA-2670/JL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1387/JL/2016 |
||
| Shri Harmesh Kumar Gaba | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar |
… | Respondent |
FPA-PMLA-1353/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1369/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1375-1377/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1384-1387/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1389-90/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1392-93/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1398-1400/JL/2016 & FPA-PMLA-1404/JL/2016
Page 1 of 4
| 6. MP-PMLA-2672/JL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1389/JL/2016 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Shri Khushant Gaba | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar |
… | Respondent |
| 7. MP-PMLA-2674/JL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1390/JL/2016 |
||
| Shri Roy Bahadur Nirwal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar |
… | Respondent |
| 8. MP-PMLA-2676/JL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1398/JL/2016 |
||
| Mr. Gurjit Kumar Gaba | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar |
… | Respondent |
| 10. MP-PMLA-2678/JL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1399/JL/2016 |
||
| Mr. Chunni Lal Gaba | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar |
… | Respondent |
| 11. MP-PMLA-2680/JL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1400/JL/2016 |
||
| Mr. Gurmesh Kumar Gaba | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar |
… | Respondent |
| 12. FPA-PMLA-1375/JL/2016 | ||
| Joginder Kaur | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar | … | Respondent |
| FPA-PMLA-1353/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1369/JL/2016, |
||
| FPA-PMLA-1375-1377/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1384-1387/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1389-90/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1392-93/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1398-1400/JL/2016 & FPA-PMLA-1404/JL/2016 |
Page 2 of 4 |
Page 2 of 4
| 13. FPA-PMLA-1376/JL/2016 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Maninder Singh @ Bitto Aulakh | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar |
… | Respondent |
| 14. FPA-PMLA-1377/JL/2016 | ||
| Jagminder Kaur | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar |
… | Respondent |
| 15. FPA-PMLA-1404/JL/2016 | ||
| Anil Kumar Jalota & Anr. | … | Appellants/Applicants |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar |
… | Respondent |
| 16. MP-PMLA-2772/JL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1384/JL/2016 |
||
| Sundeep Kaur | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar |
… | Respondent |
| 17. MP-PMLA-2664/JL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1369/JL/2016 |
||
| Suresh Kumar | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar |
… | Respondent |
| 18. MP-PMLA-2594/JL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1353/JL/2016 |
||
| Shri Ajay Jain | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar |
… | Respondent |
FPA-PMLA-1353/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1369/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1375-1377/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1384-1387/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1389-90/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1392-93/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1398-1400/JL/2016 & FPA-PMLA-1404/JL/2016
Page 3 of 4
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : None For the Respondent : None CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 29.01.2021
FPA-PMLA-1353/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1369/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA1375-1377/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1384-1387/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA1389-90/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1392-93/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-13981400/JL/2016 & FPA-PMLA-1404/JL/2016
The matters are listed on 02nd February, 2021 but due to pandemic COVID-19 situation and in view of notification dated 29.01.2021 read with earlier notifications dated 16.03.2020, 23.03.2020, 26.03.2020, 15.04.2020, 04.05.2020, 18.05.2020, 30.06.2020, 16.07.2020, 31.07.2020, 17.08.2020, 02.09.2020, 08.09.2020, 30.09.2020, 15.10.2020, 29.10.2020, 13.11.2020 and 27.11.2020, 31.12.2020 and 15.01.2021 issued by Appellate Tribunal regarding suspension of functioning of Appellate Tribunal, the matters are adjourned to 28th April, 2021.
It is to clarify that the interim order of stay/status quo, if any, already passed, to continue till the next date of hearing.
(Roma Ambwani) Registrar-in- Charge
New Delhi, 29th January, 2021
M
FPA-PMLA-1353/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1369/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1375-1377/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1384-1387/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1389-90/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1392-93/JL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1398-1400/JL/2016 & FPA-PMLA-1404/JL/2016
Page 4 of 4
Kamaljit Singh Hayer
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
Swaran Luthra
Smt. Rekha Rani
Davinder Singh Nirwal
Harmesh Kumar Gaba
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
