FPA-FE-65/MUM/2009 of M/s. Dena Bank v/s The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
M/s. Dena Bank V/s The Special Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS, PBPT Act AT NEW DELHI
| (1) FPA-FE-58/MUM/2009 M/s. South Indian Bank |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
| (2) FPA-FE-59/MUM/2009 | ||
| M/s. State Bank of Hyderabad | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (3) FPA-FE-62/MUM/2009 | ||
| M/s. Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
| (4) FPA-FE-65/MUM/2009 | ||
| M/s. Dena Bank | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| & | ||
| (5) FPA-FE-66/MUM/2009 | ||
| M/s. UCO Bank | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement Mumbai | Respondent | |
| , | … | |
| Advocates/Authorized Representatives wh | o appe | ared |
| For the Appellant (South Indian Bank) : | Shri Shri |
Madhav Khurana, Advocate Aditya Mukherjee, Advocate |
| Ms. Ms. |
Satya Jha, Advocate Riya Arora, Advocate |
FPA-FE-58-59/MUM/2009, FPA-FE-62/MUM/2009 & FPA-FE-65-66/MUM/2009
Page 1 of 2
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. South Indian Bank
- respondent
The Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
- appellant
M/s. State Bank of Hyderabad
- appellant
M/s. Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur
- appellant
M/s. Dena Bank
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court