FPA-FE-42/MUM/2014 of M/s. Krishiraj Trading Ltd. v/s The Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
ATFPFPA-FE-42/MUM/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
M/s. Krishiraj Trading Ltd. V/s The Special…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
¶2
| 1. FPA-FE-40/MUM/2014 Shri B.K. Goenka |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| 2. FPA-FE-41/MUM/2014 | ||
| M/s. Welspun Corp. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| 3. FPA-FE-42/MUM/2014 | ||
| M/s. Krishiraj Trading Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| 4. FPA-FE-43/MUM/2014 | ||
| M/s. Welspun Wintex Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| 5. FPA-FE-44/MUM/2014 | ||
| Shri Balkrishna Goenka | … | Appellant |
| 6. FPA-FE-45/MUM/2014 | ||
| Shri Rajesh Mandawela | … | Appellant |
| 7. FPA-FE-46/MUM/2014 | ||
| Shri Lal T. Hotwani | … | Appellant |
| 8. FPA-FE-47/MUM/2014 | ||
| Shri Murarilal Mittal | … | Appellant |
| 9. FPA-FE-48/MUM/2014 Shri B.K. Mishra |
… | Appellant |
| 10.FPA-FE-49/MUM/2014 | ||
| Shri K.H. Vishwanathan | … | Appellant |
| 11.FPA-FE-50/MUM/2014 | ||
| Shri Raj Kumar Jain | … | Appellant |
| 12.FPA-FE-51/MUM/2014 | ||
| Shri Nirmal Gangwal | … | Appellant |
| 13.FPA-FE-52/MUM/2014 | ||
| Shri Asim Chakraborty | … | Appellant |
| 14.FPA-FE-53/MUM/2014 | ||
| Shri Ashok Jain | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director, | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
¶3
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Shri B.K. Goenka
- appellant
M/s. Welspun Corp. Ltd.
- appellant
M/s. Krishiraj Trading Ltd.
- appellant
M/s. Welspun Wintex Ltd.
- appellant
Shri Balkrishna Goenka
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court