FPA-FE-194/MUM/2010 of Shri V.K. Rathi v/s The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
ATFPFPA-FE-194/MUM/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Shri V.K. Rathi V/s The Special Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
¶2
| FPA-FE-52/MUM/2011 | ||
|---|---|---|
| M/s. Splendour Gems Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| FPA-FE-53/MUM/2011 |
||
| Shri Kishor K. Mehta | … | Appellant |
| FPA-FE-54/MUM/2011 |
||
| Shri Govindbhai J. Patel | … | Appellant |
| FPA-FE-95/MUM/2010 | ||
| M/s. Beautiful Diamonds | … | Appellant |
| FPA-FE-96/MUM/2010 | ||
| Shri Kishore Mehta | … | Appellant |
| FPA-FE-97/MUM/2010 | ||
| Shri Rajesh Kishore Mehta | … | Appellant |
| FPA-FE-98/MUM/2010 | ||
| Shri Govindbhai J. Patel | … | Appellant |
| FPA-FE-199/MUM/2010 | ||
| M/s. Fabrigem Creation (P) Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| FPA-FE-200/MUM/2010 | ||
| Shri Prashant K. Mehta | … | Appellant |
| FPA-FE-201/MUM/2010 | ||
| Shri Rajesh Kishore Mehta | … | Appellant |
| FPA-FE-202/MUM/2010 | ||
| Shri Bharat R. Kapadia | … | Appellant |
| FPA-FE-153/MUM/2010 | ||
| M/s. Tirumala Impex | … | Appellant |
| FPA-FE-154/MUM/2010 | ||
| Shri Rais Ahmed | … | Appellant |
| FPA-FE-155/MUM/2010 | ||
| Shri Ravindra B. Wadher | … | Appellant |
| FPA-FE-215/MUM/2010 | ||
| Shri Rajat Gupta | … | Appellant |
| FPA-FE-52-54/MUM/2011, FPA-FE-95-98, 199-202, 153-155/MUM/2010 FPA-FE-215-218, 148-152, 156, 158-165/MUM/2010, |
||
| FPA-FE-180-184/MUM/2010 & FPA-FE-191-192 & 194/MUM/2010 |
Page |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
M/s. Splendour Gems Ltd. and others
- respondent
The Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Coram
AI extract
G. C. Mishra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court