Single judge order adjourning PMLA matters due to pandemic-related suspension of the Appellate Tribunal functioning and continuing interim orders till the next hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. MP-PMLA-1820/LKW/2015 (I.R.) FPA-PMLA-950/LKW/2015 Virendra Goyal … Appellant /Applicant 2. MP-PMLA-1789/LKW/2015 (I.R.) FPA-PMLA-951/LKW/2015 Neeraj Upadhyay … Appellant /Applicant 3. MP-PMLA-1790/LKW/2015 (I.R.) FPA-PMLA-952/LKW/2015 Nidhi Upadhyay … Appellant /Applicant Versus The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : None |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : None |
| CORAM | |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : ACTING CHAIRMAN |
ORDER 27.11.2020
FPA-PMLA-950, 951 & 952/LKW/2015
The matters are listed on 04th December, 2020 but due to pandemic COVID-19 situation and in view of notification dated 27.11.2020 read with earlier notifications dated 16.03.2020, 23.03.2020, 26.03.2020, 15.04.2020, 04.05.2020, 18.05.2020, 30.06.2020, 16.07.2020, 31.07.2020, 17.08.2020, 02.09.2020, 08.09.2020, 30.09.2020, 15.10.2020, 29.10.2020 & 13.11.2020 issued by Appellate Tribunal regarding suspension of functioning of Appellate Tribunal, the matters are adjourned to 18th February, 2021. FPA-PMLA-950,951, & 952/LKW/2015 Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2
It is to clarify that the interim order of stay/status quo, if any, already passed, to continue till the next date of hearing.
(Roma Ambwani) Registrar-in- Charge
New Delhi, 27th November, 2020
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-950,951, & 952/LKW/2015
Page 2 of 2
Virendra Goyal, Neeraj Upadhyay, Nidhi Upadhyay
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
G.C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
