An adjournment order in an FPA appeal where the appellant remained absent despite notice, directing the Registry to summon the appellant and set a final date for dismissal if absent.
Notice to appellant to appear on next date of hearing; appeal will be dismissed if absent on that date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-718/CHN/2014
B. Kamalam … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellant | : | None |
|---|---|---|
| For the Respondent (ED) | : | Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| SHRI G. C. MISHRA | : | ACTING CHAIRMAN |
ORDER 18.02.2020
FPA-PMLA-718/CHN/2014
None for the appellant. Shri Vikas Garg, learned counsel for the respondent is present. The appellant is not appearing since 08.08.2018. Registry is directed to issue notice to the appellant and his authorized counsel to remain present on the next date of hearing. The Registry to report compliance.
The appeal is likely to be dismissed for non-prosecution if appellant/ counsel for the appellant remain absent on the next date. List on 28th May, 2020.
(G. C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 18th February, 2020
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-718/CHN/2014
Page 1 of 1
B. Kamalam
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
