The order is adjourned as the Acting Chairman of the Appellate Tribunal was on leave on the date of hearing. No substantive legal proposition or decision on the merits is rendered in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. MP-PMLA-1986/LKW/2015 (Mics.) MP-PMLA-1596/LKW/2015 (Mics.) |
||
|---|---|---|
| MP-PMLA-1506/LKW/2015 (Affidivate) | ||
| MP-PMLA-1255/LKW/2014 (I.R.) | ||
| FPA-PMLA-683/LKW/2014 | ||
| Smt. Rama Dubey | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| 2. MP-PMLA-1506/LKW/2015 (Affidivate) MP-PMLA-1254/LKW/2014 (I.R.) FPA-PMLA-684/LKW/2014 |
||
| Shri Mayank Dubey | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| 3. MP-PMLA-1731/LKW/2015 (Mics.) MP-PMLA-1505/LKW/2015 (FDR) MP-PMLA-1507/LKW/2015 (Affidivate) MP-PMLA-1253/LKW/2014 (I.R.) |
||
| FPA-PMLA-685/LKW/2014 | ||
| Shri Radhey Shyam Dubey | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : None For the Respondent : None CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER
06.03.2020
FPA-PMLA-683-685/LKW/2014
The Coram is not complete as the Hon’ble Acting Chairman is on leave today.
Re-notify on 04th August, 2020.
(Ved Prakash Verma) Registrar
New Delhi, 06th March, 2020
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-683-685/LKW/2014
Page 1 of 1
Smt. Rama Dubey
Shri Mayank Dubey
Shri Radhey Shyam Dubey
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
G. C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
